Directors manage the company’s business on behalf of its members (shareholders). They act as an agent of the company. Directors have duties under legislation (Company Law and Insolvency Law) and under Common Law.
If a director is in breach of these duties of his or her office then s/he may be held personally liable.
The majority of The Companies Act 2006 came into force on 1st October 2007. One of its most significant changes is a new statutory statement of directors' duties which aims to clarify the law for directors by providing a single reference source setting out their duties. The statement codifies (although not without some significant changes) and replaces the common law and fiduciary duties that have been developed by the courts.
Despite this the caselaw remains relevant as the Act expressly states that regard should be had to it when interpreting the Act. It is therefore clear that the Act does not achieve creating a single source of reference for director's duties.
Under The Companies Act 2006 a director has duties to;
Exemptions from the statutory duties are not generally permitted, although certain exceptions to this can be found in s. 177. One further point is that members of a company may ratify a director's breach of duty as long as this is conducted in accordance with s.239.
As a director is an agent of the company, they can be held responsible for any actions they take on behalf of the company that breach the competition regulations set out below.
Personal Liability can also occur if a director has been involved in:
This act prohibits anti-competitive behaviour between undertakings in the UK.
An undertaking is any company, firm, business, sole trader, or any other natural or legal person capable of carrying on commercial activities relating to goods or services.
It has two main areas of regulation:
1. The prohibition of anti-competitive agreements
2. The prohibition of abuse of a dominant position in a market.
This broadly mirrors Articles 81 and 82 of The EC treaty.
This means that no undertaking may make an agreement with another undertaking that would prevent, distort or restrict competition within the UK.
In particular this refers to:
In order to be exempt from this legislation, an agreement must contribute to
i) Improving production or distribution, or
ii) Promoting technical or economic progress.
Applications must be made in writing to the Director General of Fair Trading (The Director).
The Director may cancel or vary such an exemption by notice in writing if he has reasonable grounds for believing there has been a material change in circumstances since it was granted.
Similar to anti-competitive agreements, conduct that:
This act outlines the Criminal Sanctions that a Director may face if s/he commits a ‘cartel offence’
It is an offence for individuals to dishonestly engage in cartel agreements with other persons who are at the same level as them in the production/supply chain. (i.e. their direct competitors.)
It is an offence to either make or implement such arrangements.
This is an agreement between undertakings (any company/ firm/ business/ partnership) that intends to result in any of the following:
The Enterprise Act introduces criminal sanctions alongside the financial penalties that may be imposed under the Competition Act 1998.
If convicted under summary trial then they are:
If convicted on indictment then they are:
By not making cartel agreements.
However, if you feel you may be guilty of a cartel offence but are willing to come clean about it, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) may grant a ‘no-action letter’ which the Lord Advocate will take into account when deciding whether to prosecute.
However, if the OFT believes it has enough evidence for a successful prosecution it will not issue a no-action letter to that individual.
© Levy & McRae 2008Terms and ConditionsPrivacyContactSitemap
266 St Vincent Street, Glasgow, G2 5RL +(0)141 307 2311![]()